Student Hearing FAQ
This document is intended to serve as a reference for students preparing for or participating
in the Student Conduct hearing process. It is not an exhaustive reference guide and
does not reduce the importance of reviewing the Student Code of Conduct and official
case notices to fully understand your rights and responsibilities during the conduct
process.
-
What is the primary purpose of the Student Conduct process?
Toggle More Info
The Student Conduct process is designed to determine responsibility for alleged policy
violations while promoting accountability and learning. It provides a fair process
for reviewing information, allows students to respond to concerns, and encourages
reflection on how choices may affect the student and the University community.
-
What rights do students have during the Student Conduct process?
Toggle More Info
Students have the right to be informed of the allegations and to have an opportunity
to respond. This includes the opportunity to review relevant information, share their
perspective, and participate in the process consistent with University procedures.
-
What opportunity does a Student Conduct hearing provide?
Toggle More Info
A Student Conduct hearing provides an opportunity to review information related to
the alleged violation and share your perspective. The information presented is considered
before a determination is made regarding whether a policy violation occurred.
-
What is an adjudication outcome?
Toggle More Info
An adjudication outcome is the final determination regarding responsibility for the
alleged violation and, when applicable, any assigned sanctions or educational measures.
The outcome communicates the decision and any expectations or next steps resulting
from the case.
-
If a student is found responsible for a violation, what are sanctions intended to
do?
Toggle More Info
Sanctions are intended to promote accountability, address behavior, and support student
learning. Depending on the circumstances, sanctions may include educational, restorative,
or administrative measures intended to help the student understand the impact of their
actions and make informed choices moving forward.
Reporting Faculty FAQ
This document is intended to serve as a reference for faculty reporting or participating
in the adjudication of an alleged academic integrity violation. It is not an exhaustive
reference guide and does not reduce the importance of reviewing the Student Code of
Conduct and applicable Academic Integrity procedures to fully understand your role
and responsibilities in the process.
-
After submitting a report of an alleged academic integrity violation, what is your
primary role in the adjudication process?
Toggle More Info
Your primary role is to provide relevant information, documentation, and details related
to the allegation. This helps ensure the individual or body adjudicating the case
has the information needed to understand the reported concern and evaluate the allegation
through the established Academic Integrity process.
-
If a case proceeds to a hearing, what should a reporting faculty member expect?
Toggle More Info
Reporting faculty should expect to present information regarding the allegation and
answer questions about the reported incident. Your participation helps clarify the
information and documentation submitted with the report; however, you do not serve
as the hearing officer or determine the hearing outcome.
-
Who is responsible for determining whether a student is responsible for a violation
of the Academic Integrity policy?
Toggle More Info
The designated hearing officer or hearing panel/body responsible for adjudicating
the case determines whether the student is responsible. The decision is based on the
information considered through the hearing process rather than being determined solely
by the reporting faculty member.
-
What due process right is afforded to students during the Academic Integrity adjudication
process?
Toggle More Info
Students are informed of the allegation and provided an opportunity to respond before
a decision is made. This allows the student to understand the concern, review relevant
information as provided through the process, and share their perspective before responsibility
is determined.
-
Following a hearing, how is the reporting faculty member typically involved in the
outcome process?
Toggle More Info
The reporting faculty member is informed of the outcome as permitted by University
policy. The faculty member does not determine the final hearing decision, hear appeals,
approve sanctions, or decide whether the outcome becomes part of the student's record.